advising on IT-business alignment
IT-business alignment about us blog our services articles & reports resources your profile exposure
blog
blog
Monday, July 03, 2006

IT-business alignment - is it just fluff?

An anonymous commenter on my recent "SOA petition" post here proffered:
Could you drop the "IT-business alignment" waffle as well? That would make things just perfect.
We've been aware for some time that the term "IT business alignment" is in danger of becoming yet another one of those "look at me, I'm a strategic thinker" platitudes, tossed casually into conversations to make peoples' heads nod in meetings. And yes, it did cross my mind, given our increasingly high-profile stance against gratuitous buzzphrase invention, that we might be hoist by our own petard on this one.

But we're going to stick by our strapline: "advising on IT-business alignment". Why? Because that's what we aspire to do, and we can't find a succinct way to say it using other words. And also because we're not just throwing those words around: we're actively trying to educate ourselves, our customers and industry in general about what it *means* to optimise IT within businesses, for maximum benefit to those businesses. And, most of all: because "alignment" is what businesses are telling us they want from IT.

At the very highest level, at MWD we explain the challenge and the process of alignment in terms of improving the *relationship* between a business and its IT provider organisation(s). That means we're not talking about the problem or the solution in technology terms. Why? Because the real problems in real organisations which lead to IT failing to deliver business value aren't about technology: they're about organisation and culture.

There are three elements to the story:
  • aligning IT investment with business strategy
  • aligning IT delivery with business priorities
  • aligning IT change with business change.
We strive to bring all our research and consulting back to a central question: "how does this improve the business value that organisations can get out of their IT investments?". Our very first report attempted to put a stake in the ground on this point, and we've been refining and building on our ideas ever since.

We know we're not alone in thinking this is an important topic: we (along with Dale Vile at our partner Freeform Dynamics) have been contracted by Wiley & Sons to write a book about it...watch this space. It's shaping up to be a really fun project.

On that note, if you have practical experience of the challenges organisations face in achieving this objective and ways of addressing them then we would love to talk to you.
Comments:
Guys, don't ditch it - just because the IT industry has been talking about it for a long time and yet proven to be bad at achieving it, doesn't mean it's waffle or that it somehow doesn't exist.

IT architects like to talk a lot about silos within the business and how bad they are, and yet in so many organisations, IT exists as a silo itself with respect to the business. Just because most IT departments can benefit massively from running more like a business, doesn't mean they should consider themselves to be a separate from the real businesses of which they are part!

When explaining these points I sometimes also talk about 'business-IT integration' to represent that alignment alone isn't enough, there also needs to be collaboration, communication and co-working at all levels and in all phases. But unfortunately the term 'integration' is just as overloaded and hackneyed these days. Still doesn't mean it's wrong or waffle or it shouldn't at least be aspired to.

I need to pull my finger out and blog more on this topic, but have a few thoughts at that might be interesting here.

Regards,
Sam.
sol1.blogspot.com
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


Burn this feed
Burn this feed!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Blog home

Previous posts

Vista security - Microsoft's created a Hummer
The slow, lingering death is over
VMware fesses up - sort of
Bringing the long-tailed mouse to life
100 and counting: oak trees and acorns
EMC and nLayers – another quart to be squeezed in ...
Lots happening in world of identity management
Finally, a new MWD podcast episode - SOA 2.0, and ...
SOA 2.0: The Petition
Getting to the heart of persistent identity manage...

Blog archive

March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

Blogroll

Andrew McAfee
Andy Updegrove
Bob Sutor
Dare Obasanjo
Dave Orchard
Digital Identity
Don Box
Fred Chong's WebBlog
Inside Architecture
Irving Wladawsky-Berger
James Governor
Jon Udell
Kim Cameron
Nicholas Carr
Planet Identity
Radovan Janecek
Sandy Kemsley
Service Architecture - SOA
Todd Biske: Outside the Box

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner