advising on IT-business alignment
IT-business alignment about us blog our services articles & reports resources your profile exposure
blog
blog
Monday, December 11, 2006

Cutting out the middleman

According to this story at News.com BEA will be announcing plans to release WebLogic Server Virtual Edition in the first quarter of 2007. According to the story, this is a version of the company's WebLogic Java application server which does not need an operating system. Instead, it runs on a version of BEA's JRockit Java virtual machine modified to run directly on VMware's virtualisation hypervisor.

I was at VMware's VMworld 2006 conference at the beginning of the November and VMware discussed this collaboration with BEA as part of its broader virtual appliance initiative (see this post from Stephen O'Grady over at RedMonk for some detailed analysis of virtual appliances), so this news doesn't come as a total surprise.

The story quotes Guy Churchward, VP of WebLogic products at BEA:

Our goal was to double the utilization by running natively and to double the performance.

Removing the operating system and exploiting the consolidation benefits of virtualisation is certainly consistent with Guy's utilisation claims: I am not so sure about doubling the performance though given the overheads associated with a virtualisation layer (although perhaps BEA partner Azul Systems might be able to help out with its Java Compute Appliances)

Putting those promised benefits to one side, however, this announcement does raise a number of other questions in my mind. What implications does this have for BEA's licensing which has been based on the traditional per CPU (and per core) model? How is BEA going to deal with performance optimisation, given that all of the expertise developed by the company and its customers is based on the existence of an intervening operating system. Similarly for product support, patching and management. According to the News.com story BEA will be providing a management console, Liquid Operations Control, later next year so it will be interesting to see the extent to which it addresses some of these challenges. Unless it does, customers will struggle to realise the claimed benefits. Customers will also have to rethink, hopefully with some guidance from BEA, deployment architectures since the application server is only one component of any solution and in most scenarios those other components are not going to be virtual appliances (at least in the short term).

BEA clearly hopes to exploit the significant amount of interest in virtualisation to generate interest in the WebLogic Server and should also benefit from virtual appliance evangelism from market leader VMware. However, VMware is not the only virtualisation offering out there: there's Microsoft with Virtual Server and the Longhorn-era hypervison; XenSource with it's paravirtualisation; Sun with Solaris Containers and a range of offerings. According to the article, BEA does plan to support other virtualisation solutions. Aside from the significant engineering effort that entails, I am not so sure that the likes of Microsoft and Sun are going to be too happy with a proposition based on cutting out the operating system.

This is definitely something to watch and it is going to be interesting to see how the likes of IBM, Oracle and SAP respond.
Comments:
I have been thinking about how MS benefits from paravirtualization and the rationale for supporting Xen but haven't heard analysts discuss this. Maybe this could be something you guys cover in future blog entries.
 
THanks for the suggestion.

Virtualisation (as an approach across server, desktop, storage, network, application) is one of our 6 core focus areas and we will definitely be drilling into the topic, the players, strategies etc and your suggestion will definitely figure in this.

I have discussed Microsoft and Xen a little: http://www.mwdadvisors.com/blog/2006/07/xen-and-art-of-microsoft.html
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


Burn this feed
Burn this feed!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Blog home

Previous posts

Maintenance, innovation and half-baked pies
Avoiding technobabble
HP turns adaptive on itself
Identity meets SOA
IT service management - road maps, not short cuts
Ballmer and infringing Linux
Microsoft's Interop Vendor Alliance
Another SOA podcast - with a dose of open source
Gardens and IT-business alignment
Take a message, Mr Thompson

Blog archive

March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

Blogroll

Andrew McAfee
Andy Updegrove
Bob Sutor
Dare Obasanjo
Dave Orchard
Digital Identity
Don Box
Fred Chong's WebBlog
Inside Architecture
Irving Wladawsky-Berger
James Governor
Jon Udell
Kim Cameron
Nicholas Carr
Planet Identity
Radovan Janecek
Sandy Kemsley
Service Architecture - SOA
Todd Biske: Outside the Box

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner