advising on IT-business alignment
IT-business alignment about us blog our services articles & reports resources your profile exposure
blog
blog
Monday, May 14, 2007

SAP plugs a significant gap - acquires MaXware

Well, better late than never. SAP today announced the acquisition of privately-held MaXware, a supplier of identity management infrastructure. Back in June 2005, I discussed SAP Venture's (its VC arm) investment in another identity management specialist: Ping Identity and at the beginning of 2006 predicted that SAP would enter the identity management acquisition fray. My timing was off but SAP has finally done it. In light of the investment in Ping Identity I was somewhat surprised by the choice of MaXware rather than Ping Identity but I think geography may have had a part to play. It is going to be easier for SAP to integrate a Norwegian company than one based in the US.

MaXware is hardly a new entrant in the market: the company has been around for over 15 years, initially providing virtual directory solutions. The company has subsequently built on that foundation to add identity lifecycle management, provisioning and federated web single sign-on. As a result MaXware provides SAP with a pretty comprehensive set of capabilities to bulk up its NetWeaver and broader application proposition, particularly when it comes to competing with arch-rival Oracle which has done a good job with acquiring and subsequently integrating identity management capabilities as part of Fusion Middleware.

SAP still has some way to go, obviously, when it comes to actually delivering an integrated proposition. The fact that both companies are European should help. However, I note that SAP does not appear on the list of MaXware partners and the press release doesn't mention "building on the existing strong partnership" or "exploiting existing integration between the companies' solutions" (or other such press release-ese) so its difficult to gauge the extent of the technology integration work ahead. Customers and potential customers should look for detailed integration roadmaps.

Labels: , , , ,


Burn this feed
Burn this feed!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Blog home

Previous posts

Microsoft drops virtualisation features
Sun's OpenID programme: definitely something to watch
New online SOA strategy planning tool - we need be...
Policy interoperability - a step in the right dire...
MWD FM SOA interview: TIBCO
Has Microsoft got BPM? Part II
Little SOA vs Big SOA
MWD FM SOA interview: webMethods
MWD FM SOA interview: Microsoft
Zachman Framework != Enterprise Architecture

Blog archive

March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

Blogroll

Andrew McAfee
Andy Updegrove
Bob Sutor
Dare Obasanjo
Dave Orchard
Digital Identity
Don Box
Fred Chong's WebBlog
Inside Architecture
Irving Wladawsky-Berger
James Governor
Jon Udell
Kim Cameron
Nicholas Carr
Planet Identity
Radovan Janecek
Sandy Kemsley
Service Architecture - SOA
Todd Biske: Outside the Box

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner