advising on IT-business alignment
IT-business alignment about us blog our services articles & reports resources your profile exposure
blog
blog
Friday, July 13, 2007

Getting the right focus for IT governance

I've long been a fan of Nick Malik's blog - and indeed it was his blog that led me to ask him if he'd be happy to be interviewed for our book on IT-business alignment.

In this post Nick nails quite a few aspects of IT governance, and explains how they fit in the context of embarking on an SOA initiative.

Nick correctly calls out the dual roles of governance: not only in directing work so that things are "done right"; but also in directing work so that we "do the right things". The former area is the one where IT departments are most comfortable: you can focus on getting things right while retaining a very internal IT perspective. Doing the latter and focusing on doing the right things requires another set of skills and commitments that are less familiar to most.

It's easy to look at governance as Nick outlines it (and as many others do too, including us in our book) and say "hmm, this looks like a pretty heavyweight overhead to me. If I'm going to have to make significant extra investment in this governance stuff, how can I make the case for it?"

The key point here is that one of the things that makes IT governance "good" is fitness for purpose. Governance doesn't have to entail masses of documentation, full-time headcount, onerous processes and big technology investments. As Nick implies, a key feature of governance work is agreeing a strategic destination and a set of navigation charts.

In this context, your focus shouldn't be securing headcount and defining processes: it should be on securing agreements and commitments from people to work together.

Labels: ,

Comments:
ABSOLUTELY! I once heard an 'elevator speech' for governance that goes like this:

Governance is knowing who has the final say for each of 100 different decisions, making sure that there are no conflicts of interest and that all viewpoints are respected.

That's not a headcount. Not for long anyway. That's a decision, by management, to have one way to solve a problem.
 
Well said Nick.
Sadly securing a shared commitment across management quite often runs counter to the way organisations are set up and people are incentivised...
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


Burn this feed
Burn this feed!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Blog home

Previous posts

New SOA strategy planning tool - live from today
IBM to buy Telelogic: Rational, but not inspirational
Shock, horror: Microsoft and Concordia
Microsoft's Dynamic IT: it's a start
Turning IT inside out and the trouble with ITSM an...
Swimming against the tide
Realising the identity metasystem
Microsoft server and tools is now part of the busi...
Real-world Enterprise Architecture part II: conver...
Real-world Enterprise Architecture part I: journey...

Blog archive

March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

Blogroll

Andrew McAfee
Andy Updegrove
Bob Sutor
Dare Obasanjo
Dave Orchard
Digital Identity
Don Box
Fred Chong's WebBlog
Inside Architecture
Irving Wladawsky-Berger
James Governor
Jon Udell
Kim Cameron
Nicholas Carr
Planet Identity
Radovan Janecek
Sandy Kemsley
Service Architecture - SOA
Todd Biske: Outside the Box

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner