advising on IT-business alignment
IT-business alignment about us blog our services articles & reports resources your profile exposure
blog
blog
Friday, May 19, 2006

"Software development is dead": can you smell something?

I think it's the smell of an overcooked prediction...

I just saw this over at the ever-fun ZDNet blogverse. "Software development will cease to exist"...? Riiiiiight.

I have a lot of respect for Daryl Plummer generally, and he wouldn't have got where he is today without being smart. But what's happened here? Has his brain been tampered with by an evil underground cabal of SaaS vendors?

A great friend of mine spent a long time in the 1990s working at Oracle in the Consulting group. We spoke sometimes about his work and he told me on a couple of occasions: "this stuff we're doing with Oracle CASE...it's amazing. Soon people won't need to do software development any more: we'll use CASE tools to generate code from models."

You know what? The Oracle CASE tool was pretty good: it really could go a long way towards generating workaday database applications with no coding. And where Oracle left off, companies like Forte, NatSystems, Dynasty, USoft and other (most now deceased of course) "second-generation model-based development" vendors did some amazing things. But even then, development was still involved. And then what happened? CASE and 4GL were elbowed out of the way by... Java. A retrograde step in the world of enterprise software engineering, if ever I saw one. We just get to the point where we can use advanced tools / high-level languages to enable us to quickly build and change cross-platform applications: and boom! We're back to hand-cranking 3GL code. (At least, thank heavens, Java allowed us to stop thinking about pointers.)

The idea that "development is dead" wasn't true in the days of CASE, and it still isn't true. And it will not be true for a very long time indeed. Even when, in a significant proportion of scenarios, enterprises procure SaaS solutions, there will still be other scenarios that people want to address with software development. And even in scenarios where SaaS solutions are heavily used, development will not go away. They'll need to be integrated with each other and with other things. And these days, one thing I think you *can* say pretty sweepingly is that all integration is development, and all development is integration.

Mainstream enterprise app software development is getting easier all the time, but it won't go away. I predict that with a probability of 1.
Comments:
And it will never go away - ever. Run do not walk from any tool that says otherwise.
 
Hmmm… an effective technology comes with a befitting name. ‘Agile’ as they say it. The long and abrupt, turns and twists in the alley of Software Development process now face the inevitable. Welcome to Agile Software Development methodology. With this, the Software Development process would now hopefully be more structured, less convulsive (for its developers of course!) and markedly disciplined.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home


Burn this feed
Burn this feed!

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Blog home

Previous posts

Web 2.0, "Web as place" and the value of networks
Novell and identity management: from a long-tailed...
SOA Software continues its acquisition spree
Capgemini CTO on service infrastructure
New podcast - MMS episode: on DSI and virtualisation
Microsoft and management - steady as she goes
Podcast episode #4: news analysis and some insight...
More ecosystem building from VMware
Podcast episode #3: ITSM, ITIL - where's the value?
Liberty must focus on user privacy and experience

Blog archive

March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009

Blogroll

Andrew McAfee
Andy Updegrove
Bob Sutor
Dare Obasanjo
Dave Orchard
Digital Identity
Don Box
Fred Chong's WebBlog
Inside Architecture
Irving Wladawsky-Berger
James Governor
Jon Udell
Kim Cameron
Nicholas Carr
Planet Identity
Radovan Janecek
Sandy Kemsley
Service Architecture - SOA
Todd Biske: Outside the Box

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner